xoiaeing5b
Fan
Dołączył: 21 Mar 2011
Posty: 22
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/3 Skąd: England Płeć: Kobieta
|
Wysłany: Pon 4:04, 25 Kwi 2011 Temat postu: Natural Law And ‘conservative’ Thought |
|
|
servatism is not based on race, social standing or religiosity. Great conservative thinkers and doers cover the entire social and racial spectrum. Conservatism is a structure of thought, of alive and of viewing reality. It is a cultural and mental phenomenon that has amplified and created our modern world. It is not the legacy of any one group, gang, or tyrannical system but preferably the derivative of millennia of systemic experiences; cultural mores and the applying of natural laws to establishing society.
Natural laws regulate reality. There are physical laws that accuse the real world [humans can’t fly for instance unaided, the sun heats the world, the earth is spherical etc]. Natural laws likewise inform moral codes; high standards of behaviour; ethos; high mores; familial strength; and people movement among a civilization. Natural laws are no abstract but clearly define how the real world operates and how society built by humans ought chart back to natural law. If you contravene natural laws along ignoring reality or embracing low-culture you will no only have civilisational issues, yet probably widespread social dispose as well. Think of the utopian philosophies and deep thinkers who aided build the malign vanities of Islam, Hitlerism, Communism, Feudalism, or various forms of Tyranny.
What then is the conservative ideal that ‘maps’ back to natural law? There are many large conservative thinkers [discern a list by the end of this story] and generally always of them would agree that a true conservative assists the following natural and human inspired laws of social development:
1. all people are alter, that variety of individuality and skill is to be embraced, and that there is no natural equality between 2 persons;
2. normal differences between folk makes it explicit that we absence to order society in some fashion through laws,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], social rank, economy success and skill levels;
3. a higher faith and occasion including a respect for traditions that work, heavenly inspiration, and natural law are essential to generate high culture and permanence;
4. rationality is the premise of civilizational development, but reasonable thought should be connected with a higher purpose;
5. innovation in any sphere have to be rooted in the progressive history of high culture; traditions and inside processes ‘that work’;
6. liberty to own and reserve private property is the corner-stone of civilization;
7. commerce, commerce and wealth production is the surest course to redress social and economic imbalances either domestically and cross the world;
8. the moral tenets of Christianity are the basis for civilized development and the production of the modern world; and
9. a strong military and a well-defended nation state is the merely hope to secure the interests of civilians and counter non-civilisational challenges including autocracy, paganism, and ideologies such as Islam or Hitlerism which are prevalent in ambitious.
So what does the above translate into?
You can’t have a political ideology that is coherent, moral and efficacious unless you have some kernel moralities and ideals that skeleton your philosophy. If the above points are true, and I trust they surely are, then aboard altitude of this basis you can erect manifold pillars of plan regarding; economics, social services, health care, immigration,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the military, fighting Islam and siteline control. In this sense the various groups of ‘conservatives’ represent only a subsystem or a chapter of conservative mused. There are in reality quite few political parties, think-tanks, or commentators who espouse the whole conservative dictionary and system of virtues and who have a coherent view of reality.
Political realists ambition acquaint us that a ‘total’ conservative platform or a complete conservative policy lead using the 9 points listed above as a basis, would be a huge loser. ‘Experts’ will dourly memorandum that no 1 in the modern earth accepts many of the premises of conservatism and that in many locales c
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|